Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution.
By You-Chun Li, A. Korol, T. Fahima, Eviatar Nevo. Molecular biology and evolution, 2004
1,134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54b458f90f0f798b2a7b1900293d1965ff378293
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- K. Verstrepen
- Fran Lewitter
- An Jansen
- M. Rai
- Thorsten B. H. Reusch
- Gerald Fink
- M. L. C. Vieira
- A. Graner
Citations in the corpus
- Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications : A review with special reference to fish genetics (2006, background): “A relatively low frequency of SSRs in coding regions could be explained by negative selection against frameshift mutations in the translated sequences (Metzgar et al., 2000; Li et al., 2004).”
- Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation (2007, background): “Because simple repeat sequences serve as promoter binding sites, some microsatellite polymorphisms directly upstream of genes may have a direct functional significance (Li et al., 2004).”
- Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful (2016, background): “More and more publications have presented evidence that microsatellites play a role in relevant processes, such as the regulation of transcription and translation, organization of chromatin, genome size and the cell cycle (Nevo, 2001; Li et al., 2004; Gao et al., 2013).”
- Map position and functional allelic diversity of Md-Exp7, a new putative expansin gene associated with fruit softening in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) and pear (Pyrus communis) (2008, background): “They may interfere with transcription activity, influencing the interaction with regulatory proteins by changing the distance between transcriptional factors binding sites (Li et al. 2004).”
- Development, characterization and utilization of microsatellite markers in pigeonpea (2007, background): “2001) and are characterized with more repeat numbers (Li et al. 2004) making them the best source of highly polymorphic SSR markers.”
- Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. (2005, background): “The presence of SSRs in the transcripts of genes suggests that they might have a role in gene expression or function; however, it remains to be seen whether any unusual phenotypic variation might be associated with the length of SSRs in coding regions, as was reported for several diseases in humans ”
- Identifying a Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase (ccd4) Gene Controlling Yellow/White Fruit Flesh Color of Peach (2013, background): “Slip-strand mispairing errors are corrected by mismatch repair (MMR) systems, thus SSR stability depends upon a balance between the DNA slippage and the repair effectiveness; when the MMR system is altered, SSR instability increases (Li et al. 2004).”
- 25 Oxytocin and Vasopressin: Genetics and Behavioral Implications (2006, background): “These microsatellite sequences are repetitive, unstable (Li et al., 2004), and can modulate gene expression levels and regional distribution (Hammock and Young, 2002; Hammock et al.”
- Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability (2005, background): “In humans, expansion of intragenic triplet repeats is associated with various diseases, including Huntington chorea and fragile X syndrom”
- Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants (2011, background): “Majority of intronic SSRs are monomeric and/or dimers in different taxonomic groups (Li et al. 2004).”
- Domestication evolution, genetics and genomics in wheat (2011, background): “The relationship between genomic and epigenomic diversities (Kashkush et al. 2002; Levy and Feldman 2004; Kashkush 2007) could be highlighted by deciphering the regulatory function of noncoding genomes on genic components (Li et al. 2002, 2003, 2004).”
- The emerging role of genetic diversity for ecosystem functioning: Estuarine macrophytes as models (2006, background): “Recently, abundant microsatellites have also been discovered in the immediate vicinity of expressed genes (gene-linked or type-1 microsatellites), prompting the question whether the general assumption of their selective neutrality is still tenable (Li et al. 2004).”
- Genetic Diversity of Twelve Switchgrass Populations Using Molecular and Morphological Markers (2010, background): “They have been shown to have roles in gene expression, regulation of DNA recombination, transcription and translation, as well as putative roles in providing an adaptive advantage [6, 27, 48].”