Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine

By M. Gold. 2016

6,673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54676b668ced32cfdcd6c511a6bdc3c7b556c38c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013, background): “Gold/Siegel [14,16] 1996 Consensus panel—US Public Health Service”
The Economic Value of Air-Pollution-Related Health Risks in China: A Contingent Valuation Study (2006, neutral): “This question is analogous to the standard-gamble question often used to estimate healthrelated quality of life ( Gold et al. 1996 ).”
The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. (2004, background): “, it is both the most effective and least expensive), so costeffectiveness ratios are neither necessary nor appropriate (Gold et al., 1996).”
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement (2013, neutral): “The CHEERS statement attempts to consolidate and update previous efforts [9-20] into a single useful reporting guidance.”
Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health (2008, background): “Although many economists, as well as a consensus panel convened by the US Public Health Service (Gold et al., 1996), recommend the use of utilities from the general public, eliciting decision utilities from those currently experiencing the health state in question will avoid some of the problems…”
A Comparative Review of Generic Quality-of-Life Instruments (2012, background): “[94] QALYs gained is an outcome measure that incorporates both quantity and quality of life.[95]”
Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. (2009, background): “, health return on dollars invested) (65).”
Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods (2014, background): “Through the societal perspective, we can detect ‘cost shifting’ between sectors and ac- count for alternative resources used outside the health care sector.42,43 The societal perspective is the most comprehensive because it includes all direct medical costs and indirect costs for all members in a gi”
Does the Value of a Statistical Life Vary with Age and Health Status? Evidence from the United States and Canada (2004, background): “In the QALY literature, saving the life of a chronicallyill person is valued less than that of a person in good health [ 7 ].”
The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) (2003, background): “ods that rationalize the allocation of health care resources.(1,2) Research”