Intergroup Conflicts and Their Resolution : A Social Psychological Perspective

By D. Bar-Tal. 2011

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/543c50c5c4ab18473312873cae97a257fa32b7a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Eran Halperin
2. Neta Oren
3. D. Bar-Tal
4. Michele J. Gelfand

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Eran Halperin
2. D. Bar-Tal
3. Neta Oren
4. Keren Sharvit
5. A. Zafran
6. Michele J. Gelfand
7. Arie W. Kruglanski
8. James J. Gross

Citations in the corpus

• Socio–Psychological Barriers to Peace Making: The Case of the Israeli Jewish Society (2010, background): “There is no doubt that some disagreements are very deep and difficult to resolve because human beings do not readily relinquish resources, control, power, or prestige (Bar-Tal, 2011).”
• The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism (2014, background): “Additionally, dehumanization and delegitimization of out-group members (Bandura, 1988; Bar-Tal, 1990, 2011), implies that killing them does not actually constitute encroachment on the killing prohibition that applies to humans.”
• Ethos of conflict: The concept and its measurement. (2012, background): “An understanding of these issues can indicate the feasibility of resolving the conflict peacefully, because EOC also serves as a major sociopsychological barrier to peace building (Bar-Tal & Halperin, 2011: Bar-Tal, Halperin, & Oren, 2010; Halperin & Bar-Tal, 2011).”