Inbreeding, kinship, and the evolution of natal dispersal

By N. Perrin, Jérôme Goudet. 2001

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/542866a31eb5b9636063c7ff8f128f2fc9ea3ca3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Eco‐evolutionary dynamics in fragmented landscapes (2017, unknown): “…involving immigrants, as regularly found in small populations, is a second factor that is predicted to favour the evolution of higher dispersal (Gandon 1999, Perrin and Goudet 2001), and this might be enhanced in fragmented landscapes because of increased risk of inbreeding (Cote et al. 2017a).”
Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex‐biased dispersal (2007, background): “Such conflicting pressures are likely to induce a strong sex-bias in dispersal (Perrin & Goudet 2001).”
Multiple proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in white-tailed deer (2008, unknown): “Alternatively, in animals with strong social structures, kin selection may favor philopatry if kin cooperation improves reproductive success (Pusey 1987; Perrin and Goudet 2001); however, as male white-tailed deer are not cooperative breeders, it is likely that increased competition for mates, wheth”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “In practice, separating the evolution of dispersal as a means to avoid inbreeding as opposed to avoiding kin competition is difficult (Perrin & Goudet, 2001).”
Natal dispersal of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Switzerland (2005, background): “Perrin & Goudet (2001) emphasized that potential causes are too often considered as alternative rather than interacting factors.”
Patterns and dynamics of sex-biased dispersal in a nocturnal primate, the grey mouse lemur, Microcebus murinus (2003, background): “Kinship and kin selection, on the other hand, may also promote dispersal if the dispersion of kin results in a decreased kin competition, as has been theoretically shown by Gandon & Michalakis (2001) and Perrin & Goudet (2001).”
The relative contribution of individual and kin selection to the evolution of density-dependent dispersal rates (2007, background): “inter-patch differences in population density and dispersal mortality (Poethke and Hovestadt, 2002), kin selection is driven by genetic differences between local populations (Taylor, 1988; Gandon and Michalakis, 2001; Perrin and Goudet, 2001).”
Experimental evolution of dispersal in spatiotemporally variable microcosms (2003, background): “…be favoured in a stable environment as a means of reducing kin competition (Hamilton & May 1977; Motro 1983; Frank 1986; Gandon & Michalakis 1999; Perrin & Goudet 2001) or the cost of demographic stochasticity (Travis & Dytham 1998; Parvinen et al. 2003), but is disfavoured by variation in…”
The evolution of density‐dependent dispersal in a noisy spatial population model (2006, background): “Dispersal helps avoiding kin competition (Ronce et al. 1998, Gandon and Michalakis 2001, Lambin et al. 2001, Perrin and Goudet 2001) and prevents inbreeding (Hamilton and May 1977, Motro 1991, Gandon and Michalakis 2001, O’Riain and Braude 2001, Perrin and Goudet 2001).”
Gender-specific dispersal distances of grizzly bears estimated by genetic analysis (2004, background): “At the individual level, dispersal is hypothesized to be a mechanism to minimize inbreeding (Pusey 1987; Johnson and Gaines 1990; Pusey and Wolf 1996; Perrin and Goudet 2001), reduce competition for resources among related individuals (Greenwood 1980; Waser 1985), reduce competition for mates among ”
Population fragmentation and inter-ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States (2012, background): “It can minimize inbreeding of individuals (Pusey 1987, Johnson and Gaines 1990, Pusey and Wolf 1996, Perrin and Goudet 2001), reduce competition for mates and resources among relatives (Greenwood 1980, Dobson 1982, Waser 1985), or both (Dobson and Jones 1985, Gandon and Michalakis 2001).”