Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05)

By Paul P. G. Boersma. 2009

1,951 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54255c8fc463b9d067b8370d79f0c5ec0f939f09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. (2009, methodology): “…s. Based upon results of pretests with both adults and children, the F0 of the final word was increased by using the software Praat (Version 4.1.15, Boersma and Weenink 2004) by 35% for the weak incongruity and by 120% for the strong incongruity (without changing the original pitch contour of…”
The Role of Task and Listener Characteristics in Second Language Listening. (2015, background): “0.25 (Boersma & Weenink, 2008), vocd of the CHILDES system (MacWhinney, 2000), WebVocab- Profile v3 (Cobb, n.d.), and CohMetrix v2.”
Voice pitch influences voting behavior (2012, methodology): “We created a lower-pitched and higher-pitched version of each president's voice using the Pitch-Synchronous Overlap Add (PSOLA, France Telecom) method in Praat software (Boersma & Weenink, 2009).”
Voicesauce: A Program for Voice Analysis (2009, methodology): “VS can make measurements of F0 using any of three different programs: STRAIGHT [9], the Snack Sound Toolkit [13], or Praat [1], which offers a choice of autocorrelation and cross-correlation algorithms.”
rVAD: An Unsupervised Segment-Based Robust Voice Activity Detection Method (2019, methodology): “It has been experimentally shown that using Praat pitch extraction [67] gives almost the same VAD results.”
Unsupervised Learning for Expressive Speech Synthesis (2017, background): “• JShimm is Local jitter and shimmer (extracted with [3]).”
Edinburgh Research Explorer Investigating the inner speech of people who stutter: Evidence for (and against) the Covert Repair Hypothesis. (unknown): “Participants‟ overt recitations of the tonguetwisters were captured on a Zoom H2 digital recorder and analyzed using Praat software (Boersma & Weenink, 2009).”
The animal nature of spontaneous human laughter (2014, methodology): “Acoustic analyses were performed on all laughs using Praat, version 5.3.01 (Boersma & Weenink, 2011).”
Vocal masculinity is a robust dominance signal in men (2010, methodology): “All settings were in accordance with the programmers’ recommendations for adult male voices (Boersma and Weenik 2009).”
Controllable Emphasis with zero data for text-to-speech (2023, methodology): “We used the Praat software [32] to compare three acoustic dimensions (duration, pitch, energy) for the word traditionally when emphasized by our model and when produced without emphasis (see Figure 7), as part of the sentence and it’s traditionally one of the experiences we naturally try to avoid .”