Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks: The Case of Over

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis (2009, methodology): “As for the former approach, information provided by the context the word under study occurs in is not taken into account (cf. Sandra and Rice 1995; Tyler and Evans 2001), there is no”
The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition (2003, methodology): “…of information in their representations of individual lexical entries, which is more appropriately understood as deriving from background and world knowledge, and human cognitive processing abilities (Kreitzer, 1997; Sandra, 1998; Sandra and Rice, 1995; Tyler and Evans, 2001b; Vandeloise, 1990).”
The cognitive linguistics enterprise: an overview (2007, methodology): “More recent work (e.g., Tyler & Evans, 2001/this volume, 2003) has sought to address some of the difi culties inherent in Lakof ’s approach by providing a methodology for examining senses associated with lexical categories.”
The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary (2008, positive): “Tyler and Evans[325] give a detailed analysis of the range of meanings associated with spatial particles and provide a detailed analysis of the word over.[324] Allen[2] gives a temporal algebra that can be used to describe intervals of time.”