The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): Ecological, Concurrent and Construct Validity

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cognitive theories of autism (2007, methodology): “For example, in the BADS test, some of the subtests have multiple components: planning, problem solving and monitoring behaviour are required for the Zoo Map and ModiWed Six Elements (Norris & Tate, 2000).”
The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills (2003, background): “Six studies investigated the ecological validity of tests of executive functioning (Burgess et al., 1998; Dimitrov et al., 1996; Evans et al., 1997; Norris and Tate, 2000; Poole et al., 1999; Ready et al., 2001).”
The Elusive Nature of Executive Functions: A Review of our Current Understanding (2007, background): “The group of behavioral and cognitive anomalies found in frontal patients became known as the “dysexecutive syndrome” (Baddeley and Wilson 1988) which includes problems in planning, organization, abstraction reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making (Ardila and Surloff 2004; Norris and Tate 20”
Practitioner review: do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? (2013, unknown): “Performance on this particular subtest has been found to be unrelated to other conventional performance-based tests of executive function (Norris & Tate, 2000). mance-based and ratings measures of executive function in a sample of adults with ADHD.”