Which Countries Protect Intellectual Property? The Case of Software Piracy

By D. Marron, D. Steel. 2000

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/539aea23bdeebc9061018e1f5eef5d30823ed7de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. H. van Kranenburg
2. John Hagedoorn
3. Jiatao Li
4. Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John Hagedoorn
2. Jiatao Li
3. Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode

Citations in the corpus

• Piracy and the Legitimate Demand for Recorded Music (2003, unknown): “Empirically, national software piracy rates have been shown to be related to income and culture (Gopal and Sanders 1998 and 2000; Marron and Steel 2000; Husted 2000).”
• Purchasing pirated software: an initial examination of Chinese consumers (2005, background): “piracy correlates significantly (Husted, 2000; Marron and Steel, 2000).”
• Developing new innovation models: Shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management (2009, background): “In terms of patents applied by non-residents, China and South Korea led the pack with 42% and 18% respectively.”
• Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships (2005, background): “In general, the more economically developed a country is, the higher it scores on these dimensions of intellectual property rights protection (Rapp and Rozek, 1990; Ginarte and Park, 1997; Marron and Steel, 2000; Primo Braga et al., 2000; Varsakelis, 2001).”