What is the significance of The Origin of Concepts for philosophers' and psychologists' theories of concepts?

By Nicholas Shea, Karenleigh A. Overmann, T. Wynn, Frederick L. Coolidge. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks (2018, background): “Thus remarkably, even a deep linear network can provably exhibit the same broad to specific changes in patterns of inductive projection that are empirically observed in many works [2, 3, 17, 18].”
Numerosity, Abstraction, and the Emergence of Symbolic Thinking (2012, background): “In other words, for Coolidge and Overmann the process responsible for the development of numerical and symbolic thinking takes place inside the head (but see Overmann, Wynn, and Coolidge 2011).”
Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate (2013, background): “As with all contemporary scientific approaches to learning and development, the dynamic systems framework is not complete; in our judgment, adopting the theoretical resources of an action-based perspective could be mutually beneficial (Allen & Bickhard, 2011c).”