Correlation model for spatially distributed ground‐motion intensities

547 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatial Cross‐Correlation Models for Vector Intensity Measures (PGA, I a , PGV, and SAs) Considering Regional Site Conditions (2013, methodology): “It is worth pointing out that the isotropic assumption for the spatial distribution of the intraevent residuals have been verified for some events, such as the Northridge earthquake (Jayaram and Baker, 2009).”
Influence of spatial correlation of strong ground motion on uncertainty in earthquake loss estimation (2011, background): “Evans and Baker [23] used the NGA database [24], which is primarily based on Californian data and a few earthquakes in Taiwan (the Chi-Chi earthquake and large aftershocks).”
A spatial cross‐correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods (2013, background): “Previous studies have indicated that the correlation structure of residuals from ground motion models is not dependent on the considered direction, and is therefore isotropic [1, 10, 12, 16].”
Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves (2015, methodology): “Jayaram N, Baker J. Correlation Model for Spatially Distributed Ground-Motion Intensities.”