A TEST OF LIFE‐COURSE EXPLANATIONS FOR STABILITY AND CHANGE IN ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR FROM ADOLESCENCE TO YOUNG ADULTHOOD*

By R. Simons, Eric A. Stewart, L. Gordon, R. Conger, G. Elder,. 2002

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5344ef9ef65a099be3f4355b235c128e7ee077b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Network Relationships, Prison Experiences, and Internal Transformation on Women's Success After Prison Release (2010, background): “…of help avoiding drugs and crime, some family, partners, and friends contribute to illegal behavior (Bonta, Pang, & Wallace-Carpretta, 1995; Brown, 2006; Danner, Blown, Silverman, & Vega, 1995; Griffin & Armstrong, 2003; Henriques & Manatu-Rupert, 2001; Leverentz, 2006; Simons et al., 2002).”
Social isolation and inmate behavior: A conceptual framework for theorizing prison visitation and guiding and assessing research (2013, background): “…shed light on theoretical questions about the effects on behavior of strong versus weak ties, of authority versus non-authority figures, and of criminal versus non-criminal associates (e.g., Granovetter 1983; Simons et al. 2002; Wolff and Draine 2004; Naser and La Vigne 2006; Cobbina et al. 2012).”
Does Marriage Reduce Crime? (2015, methodology): “For example, marital attachmentmay be important for some types of offending or only for males (or females) (Simons et al. 2002; Oudekerk, Burgers, andReppucci 2014).”
Love, Sex, and Crime: Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Offending (2008, unknown): “A parallel possibility is that biological factors, such as early physical maturity, initiate a process in which certain individuals select into both dating and crime at an earlier age than their peers (e.g., Moffitt et al. 2001; Simons et al. 2002).”
The Effects of Adolescent Activities on Delinquency: A Differential Involvement Approach (2005, methodology): “Most of the items here had been used in other research studies of delinquency such as the Youth in Transition Study (Bachman, 1975), the Rochester Youth Development Study (Thornberry et al., 1991), the National Youth Survey (Elliott et al., 1985), the Denver Youth Survey (Huizinga et al., 1991), and”
Gendered Transitions (2009, methodology): “This contradictory evidence has been for men only (Simons et al. 2002 found no effect of relationship quality on men’s desistance) and for men and women (Giordano et al. 2002).”
Men, Women, and Postrelease Offending (2012, background): “For instance, as mentioned earlier, in their study of antisocial behavior from adolescence to adulthood, Simons et al. (2002) found that romantic partnerships had a greater influence on criminal behavior for females than for males.”
Women Coming Home: Long‐Term Patterns of Recidivism (2010, background): “…there is some evidence that marriage and intimate relationships may enhance opportunities for criminality through “negative assortative mating”; (Becker, 1981) or partnering with a mate with greater involvement in criminal behavior (see also Alarid, Burton, & Cullen, 2000; Simons et al., 2002).”
A LIFE-COURSE PERSPECTIVE ON SPIRITUALITY AND DESISTANCE FROM CRIME (2008, result): “Next, we examine the role of spirituality under varying conditions of network (intimate partner and peer) criminality, since the latter emerged as significant predictors in our earlier analyses, as well as in studies based on other data sets (see e.g., Simons et al., 2002).”