Social isolation and inmate behavior: A conceptual framework for theorizing prison visitation and guiding and assessing research
By Joshua C. Cochran, D. Mears. 2013
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dc362a85e7f83c58348dad170c27d725938ecab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In General Health Professions
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Tasca
- J. Turanovic
- I. brunton-smith
- D. McCarthy
- N. Rodriguez
- Joshua C. Cochran
- Philip Mulvey
- Travis C. Pratt
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Prisoner Attachment to Family on Re-entry Outcomes: A Longitudinal Assessment (2016, background): “Existing research has frequently identified the negative effect of prison on prisoners’ abilities to maintain contact with family (Hairston 1991; Cochran and Mears 2013; Duwe and Clark 2013), and there is little reason to expect that already damaged relations can be meaningfully repaired in such an ”
- Families coming together in prison: An examination of visitation encounters (2016, background): “Considering the mixed findings on the impact of prison visitation on recidivism, scholars note the need for studies that tap into the nature of visitation experiences, across a diverse group of prisoners and visitor types (Cochran and Mears, 2013).”
- Inmates’ Experiences with Prison Visitation (2019, background): “So while, on balance, visits can be positive for inmates, there is certainly variability that needs to be explored (Bales & Mears, 2008; Cochran & Mears, 2013; Mears et al., 2012).”
- Breaches in the Wall (2014, background): “To account for the potential effect of in-prison misconduct on recidivism (e.g., Cochran et al. 2013; Trulson, DeLisi, and Marquart 2011) and visitation opportunities, the analyses include a variety score measure of in-prison misconduct that ranges from 0 to 7, and counts the number of the…”