Performance Funding for Higher Education: What Are the Mechanisms What Are the Impacts

By Kevin J. Dougherty, V. T. Sudharshan Reddy. 2013

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5325a40bac35bd0325d8ffdabcd731ddd94a82f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating the Impacts of “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education (2015, background): “Many states adopted this strategy during the New Accountability movement of the 1990s, but a lack of financial and political support in the early 2000s resulted in many states abandoning these initiatives (Dougherty & Reddy, 2013).”
Performance Funding for Higher Education (2014, methodology): “…America and philanthropic organizations such as the Lumina and gates Foundations played a considerable role in the development of wave 2 programs (Dougherty et al. 2013; Dougherty, Natow et al. 2014; Dougherty and Natow forthcoming; Lumina Foundation 2011; Social Program Evaluators and…”
State Higher Education Performance Funding: Data, Outcomes, and Policy Implications* (2014, background): “Proponents further argue that such programs make it easier for policy makers and the public to ensure that higher education institutions are serving the public interest, evaluate the institutions’ overall performance, encourage innovation, and impose sanctions when institutions fail to produce desir”
Evaluating Impacts of Performance Funding Policies on Student Outcomes in Higher Education (2014, background): “Although the precise criteria that separate PF 1.0 policies from 2.0 policies are somewhat unclear, Dougherty and Reddy (2013) argue that the main difference is that PF 2.0 uses performance criteria to allocate base appropriations, whereas PF 1.0 policies use performance only to allocate bonus…”
Performance-Based Funding in American Higher Education: A Systematic Synthesis of the Intended and Unintended Consequences (2020, background): “The Intended Outcomes of PBF Adoption The policy goal associated with implementing PBF is to improve targeted institutional outcomes through the provision of material incentives (Burke, 2002; Dougherty & Reddy, 2013).”