Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention

By Harald T. Schupp, B. Cuthbert, Margaret M. Bradley, Charles H. Hillman, Alfons O. Hamm, Peter J. Lang. 2004

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53074d72c9167f14f131acc9a8d75b5bece613ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Fear on Emotional Brand Attachment (2014, background): “This system is responsible for the “fight-or-flight” survival mechanism (Cannon 1929; Izard 1977) and leads to greater sensitivity to the environment (Schupp et al. 2004).”
The emotive neuroscience of embodiment (2012, background): “LPPs are also larger to scenes of mutilation and threat compared to scenes of contamination and loss (Schupp et al. 2004).”
Emotion and the motivational brain (2009, background): “, mutilated bodies) hedonic contents (Schupp et al., 2004).”
Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (2018, background): “In healthy individuals, these stimuli tend to evoke the most negative responses across a range of self-report and physiological measures (e.g., Bradley, Codispoti, Sabatinelli, & Lang, 2001; Schupp et al., 2004).”
Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion (2008, background): “, 2002; Palomba, Angrilli, & Mini, 1997), with the largest modulatory differences elicited when viewing the most arousing pleasant or unpleasant pictures (Schupp et al., 2004).”
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, methodology): “For instance, focusing on the fear system, we re cently obtained evidence that threatening faces are associated with increased EPN and LPP amplitudes compared to neutral and friendly faces (Schupp et al., 2004c). experience.”
Merely Being with you Increases My Attention to Luxury Products: Using EEG to Understand Consumers’ Emotional Experience with Luxury Branded Products (2015, background): “Prior research suggests that the modulation of P2 and P3 amplitude to emotional visual stimuli is most distinct in the posterior scalp location (Carretié, Martín-Loeches, et al. 2001; Carretié, Mercado, et al. 2001; Keil et al. 2002; Schupp et al. 2004).”
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review (2010, background): “For instance, Schupp and colleagues presented visual stimuli for 120 to 333 msec and found an increased LPP up to 300 msec after picture offset (Schupp et al., 2004a; Schupp et al., 2007).”
Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. (2008, methodology): “The main theoretical interpretation of the EPN is that it indexes “natural selective attention,” such that evaluation of image features is guided by perceptual qualities that select affectively arousing stimuli for further processing (Dolcos and Cabeza, 2002; Schupp et al., 2004).”
Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study (2010, background): “Second, attention allocation, as indicated by the P3 response, may reflect how the groups are engaging attention resources to process the stimuli, which may be driven from their previous experience (Johnson, 1988; Schupp et al., 2004).”