A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions
By A. Gilmore. 2004
281 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52bca7ad4efeca095e63457de0074a5e83af4db4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Using authentic materials in the foreign language classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives in EFL classes (2015, background): “Professors and experts of teaching language should maintain the enhancing power of the authentic materials (Gilmore, 2007). By using authentic materials students know how to use language in real world and improve their proficiency level in four skills of language learning. McNeil and Kilickaya (2004”
- Materials evaluation and design in language teaching (2002, background): “…the volume is primarily on evidence from spoken corpora since it is typically spoken discourse that has been poorly represented in coursebooks (e.g. Gilmore 2004; Cullen & Kuo 2007), and contributors show how a corpusinformed approach can help materials designers with decisions about what…”
- Authenticity, Culture and Language Learning (2006, background): “Alptekin (2002) questions the relevance of a monocultural model of competence to the contemporary, globalised contexts in which communication in the English language now takes place: How relevant, then, are the conventions of British politeness or American informality to the Japanese and Turks, say,”
- Materials development for language learning and teaching (2012, background): “For example, Gilmore (2004) compares textbook and authentic interactions and Lam (2010) reports the high frequency of the discourse particle ‘well’ in the Hong Kong corpus of Spoken English compared to its infrequency in the coursebooks used there.”