Innate antipredator responses of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) depend on predator species and their diet
By S. Vilhunen, H. Hirvonen. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2003
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52b82dfd323ca6add2fd4714332dc3b304e7a9e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Roberts
- J. Taylor
- A. Salvanes
- Grant E. Brown
- Victoria A. Braithwaite
- C. G. Leaniz
- H. Hirvonen
- L. Galhardo
Citations in the corpus
- Less is more: social learning of predator recognition requires a low demonstrator to observer ratio in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) (2004, methodology): “The ability of charr to recognize the chemical cues of natural predators is well studied and their antipredator skills could possibly be improved by training (Hirvonen et al. 2000; Vilhunen and Hirvonen 2003).”
- Learning about Danger: Chemical Alarm Cues and Threat‐Sensitive Assessment of Predation Risk by Fishes (2011, background): “Several other species, including brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans, Gasterosteidae; Chivers et al. 1995), brook trout (Salvelinus namaycush, Salmonidae; Mirza & Chivers 2000, 2001), brown trout (Salmo trutta, Salmonidae; Alvarez & Nicieza 2003), common bully (Gobiomorphus cotidianus, Eleotridae; ”
- Psychological Stress and Welfare in Fish (2009, background): “This behaviour may occur, for example, as a defensive mechanism against fear (e.g. Yue et al., 2004), or as an anti-predator defence (e.g. Vilhunen & Hirvonen, 2003).”
- Environmental enrichment reduces maladaptive risk-taking behavior in salmon reared for conservation (2011, methodology): “Following each behavioral assay, the two test arenas were drained, cleaned, and carefully washed with 90% ethanol to prevent carry-over effects from previous scents (Vilhunen and Hirvonen, 2003).”
- The need to understand the behaviour of fish reared for mariculture or restocking (2006, background): “Some studies showed an effect which could have a positive influence on survival (Brown and Smith, 1998; Nødtvedt et al., 1999; Mirza and Chivers, 2000; Hossain et al., 2002), while others found no effect (Johnsson and Abrahams, 1991; Vilhunen and Hirvonen, 2003).”
- The role of learning in the development of threat-sensitive predator avoidance by fathead minnows (2005, background): “Many prey species do not show an innate recognition of their potential predators (invertebrates: Rochette et al. 1998; birds: Curio et al. 1978; mammals: McLean et al. 1996; Griffin et al. 2001), including fish (Mathis et al. 1993; Chivers & Smith 1994a; but see: Berejikian et al. 2003; Vilhunen & ”
- Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Mathis et al. (2008) and Ferrari and Chivers (2009b) found that embryos of Woodfrogs and Ringed Salamanders (Ambystoma annulatum Cope, 1886), while still encased in their egg shells, learn to recognize a novel predator through pairing of injured conspecific cues and novel predator odour.”