Individual Option Prices for Climate Change Mitigation

By T. Cameron. 2005

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5270bcee374af132bcb7278926b36a0e32890b3b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Paying for Mitigation: A Multiple Country Study (2012, unknown): “Cameron (2005) used a convenience sample of college students and found that respondents who are more certain about a given increase in average temperatures have a higher WTP to prevent such an increase.”
Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia (2011, methodology): “First, the studies conducted by Cameron (2005) and Viscusi and Zeckhauser (2006) involved convenience sample (a group of college students were recruited as sample) whereas the current study involved a public survey.”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…the questionnaire should include debriefing questions to allow the effect on value estimates to be evaluated during data analysis and ameliorated if possible (Adamowicz et al. 1997; Cameron 2005a, 2005b; Burghart et al. 2007; Cameron et al. 2011; Kataria et al. 2012; Cameron and DeShazo 2013).”
Updating Subjective Risks in the Presence of Conflicting Information: An Application to Climate Change (2003, background): “The models explored in this paper were developed because it is clear from other work (Cameron, 2002) that individuals subjective perceptions of climate change risks at the point of making a policy choice figure strongly in their willingness to pay for climate change mitigation programs.”
What determines urban households' willingness to pay for CO2 emission reductions in Turkey: A contingent valuation survey (2011, background): “Apart from the failure to achieve consensus on how mitigation costs are to be distributed among nations, as just recently observed during the negotiations at the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, the extent to which policymakers and above all the general public in differen”