Representational economy in constraint-based phonology

By G. Clements. 2001

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/524c6d53828d2c0ccc6c6ed6b6d4f79b646a429b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Larry M. Hyman
2. D. C. Hall
3. Rachel Walker
4. Sharon Rose
5. Greville Corbett

In Language and Linguistics

1. Larry M. Hyman
2. D. C. Hall
3. Rachel Walker
4. Sharon Rose
5. Greville Corbett

Citations in the corpus

• A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence (2004, background): “It is also found in Basque (Hualde 1991, Trask 1997, Clements 2001), Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber (Elmedlaoui 1992), Moroccan Arabic (Heath 1987), Bantu languages such as Kinyarwanda (Kimenyi 1979) and Kirundi (Ntihirageza 1993), and Omotic languages such as Aari (Hayward 1990) and Maale (Amha 2001).”
• The Role and Representation of Contrast in Phonological Theory (2007) (2007, methodology): “The fact that the largest inventory scores the lowest on the exploitation and frugality indices is suggestive of the ways in which feature economy interacts with other factors identified by Clements (2004) as shaping inventories, in particular with his principle of robustness, which holds that some ”
• How autosegmental is phonology? (2013, background): “where L is otherwise not phonologically activated in the sense of Clements (2001: 2). (ii) These Ls come in late in the derivation: postlexical L on depressors (Ribe), postlexical stem-initial L (Ndebele), postlexical L on in the environment L-H # __ H (Kalabari), postlexical L on the intonationally”