A Typology of Consonant Agreement as Correspondence

By Sharon Rose, Rachel Walker. 2004

433 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4f3196c9b987f0eeb8b966a56f9fd9175d0244f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Half rhymes in Japanese rap lyrics and knowledge of similarity (2007, background): “…sonorants are more rhymable with voiced obstruents than with voiceless obstruents, 7 and this observation implies that voicing in sonorants promotes similarity with voiced obstruents (see Coetzee and Pater 2005; Côté 2004; Frisch et al. 2004; Stemberger 1991, 94-96; Rose and Walker 2004; Walker”
Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: evidence from Hebrew. (2007, background): “Thus, a restriction on the co-occurrence nonadjacent consonants in the stem does not require their representation by means of a special morphological constituent (see also Rose & Walker, 2004).”
Learning Long-Distance Phonotactics (2010, background): “Together these properties define precedence, which is at the heart of the learning proposal.”
Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony (2006, background): “However, in light of recent research (Hansson 2001, Frisch et al. 2004, Rose & Walker 2004) it appears that the ‘closest trigger wins’ principle is not exceptionless ; and it is entirely incompatible with the view taken here, in which variation in Hungarian is attributed to conflicting harmony…”
Locality and globality in phonological variation (2011, background): “In order for a harmony constraint to force covariation in Warao, it would need to require that non-adjacent consonants agree in voicing.23 Rose and Walker (2004) and others have argued for the existence of long-distance voicing assimilation.”
Syntagmatic distinctness in consonant deletion (2004, background): “…2002, Colantoni & Steele 2004), degemination (Siptár 2000), dissimilation (Suzuki 1998), reduplication (Wedel 2000), long-distance agreement between consonants (Hansson 2001, Rose & Walker 2001) and the pronunciation of adjacent identical morphemes (Tang 2000), to name a few recent examples.”
Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism (2012, neutral): “This is not necessarily the case for other types of correspondence—Output-Output correspondence (Benua 1997) and Agreement by Correspondence (Hansson 2001; Rose and Walker 2004) operate at a level of representation where non-identity may not be attributable to the application of operations in GEN.”