Evaluation of fast-acquisition GPS in stationary tests and fine-scale tracking of green turtles

By J. Hazel. 2009

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5236d06b180041a1e8cd217ff54200a9a043fc59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Hays
2. Bj Godley
3. Lucy A. Hawkes
4. AC Broderick
5. G. Schofield
6. M. Hamann
7. P. Casale
8. P. Luschi

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Hays
2. Bj Godley
3. AC Broderick
4. Lucy A. Hawkes
5. P. Luschi
6. P. Casale
7. Michael S. Coyne
8. G. Schofield

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Hays
2. Bj Godley
3. Lucy A. Hawkes
4. G. Schofield
5. P. Luschi
6. AC Broderick
7. P. Casale
8. M. Hamann

Citations in the corpus

• Global analysis of satellite tracking data shows that adult green turtles are significantly aggregated in Marine Protected Areas (2012, background): “For green turtles, core foraging areas, are typically much smaller in size than the majority of MPAs to which turtles were tracked (e.g. Seminoff et al., 2002, Troëng et al., 2005, Broderick et al., 2007; Hazel, 2009; Godley et al., 2010).”
• Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data (2012, result): “Our study builds on a growing body of literature documenting Argos location errors of free-ranging animals when compared to concurrent GPS data (Soutullo et al. 2007; Hazel 2009; Kuhn et al. 2009; Costa et al. 2010; Witt et al. 2010).”
• BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles (2010, background): “While short-term home range studies exist for herbivorous adult (Whiting & Miller, 1998; Hazel, 2009) and juvenile (Seminoff et al.”
• The accuracy of Fastloc‐GPS locations and implications for animal tracking (2014, methodology): “Scientists on the field also used Fastloc-GPS tags as a crosscheck reference to investigate Argos locations accuracy (Hazel 2009; Costa et al. 2010; Hoenner et al. 2012).”
• Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review (2014, background): “…new models of Argos-linked PTTs have been developed also featuring a global positioning system (GPS) receiver; these instruments can acquire GPS ephemeris even during the short surfacings of the turtle (thanks to special technologies allowing fast data acquisition, such as Fastloc; Hazel 2009).”
• Assessing accuracy and utility of satellite-tracking data using Argos-linked Fastloc-GPS (2010, methodology): “Recent attempts to assess Argos and Fastloc-GPS location accuracy have been made utilizing ArgoseFastloc PTTs (Hazel 2009; Sims et al. 2009); but with tracking durations that have been relatively short (range 4.”
• Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, methodology): “As the Global Positioning System (GPS) has a higher accuracy than ARGOS (km for ARGOS, m for GPS; Hazel 2009, Costa et al. 2010a) GPS receivers are often inserted in ARGOS tags.”
• Home on the range: spatial ecology of loggerhead turtles in Atlantic waters of the USA (2011, methodology): “Although satellite telemetry has until recently been the only available method with which to remotely obtain spatial information about a large number of tracked animals, there are inherent, variable and for some classes, unknown errors in the Argos location data (Hazel, 2009; Kuhn et al., 2009), whi”