Is Neoclassical Economics Still Entrepreneurless

By Milo Bianchi, Magnus Henrekson. 2005

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/521c33478df0e8e20b8c9a29c162ea0ac0b72bf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Competencies and Institutions Fostering High-growth Firms (2008, unknown): “…of change, the entrepreneurs, are still defined rather narrowly and theory does not capture the wide-ranging and complex functions suggested outside mainstream economics (see, e.g., Baumol 1968, Glancey and McQuaid 2000, Swedberg 2000, Johansson 2004, Bianchi and Henrekson 2005, and Phelps 2007).”
Entrepreneurship, Evolution and Geography (2009, background): “Neo-classical theories have not been able to deal adequately with the innovation and motivations involved in entrepreneurship (cf. Bianchi and Henrekson 2005).”
The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions (2019, background): “However, as many economists have pointed out (Baumol, 1968; Bianchi and Henrekson, 2005; Hayek, 1946), the entrepreneur is still not integrated with the core of economic theory.”
The Impact of Personal Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioural Control on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Women (2016, background): “In the developing world successful small and medium companies are the main reasons for poverty reduction and job creation (Bianchi & Henrekson, 2005; Reynolds, Bygrave, Autio, & Hay, 2002).”
Entrepreneurship: A Weak Link in the Welfare State (2005, unknown): “…following definition (see Wennekers and Thurik 1999): Entrepreneurship is the ability and willingness of individuals, both on their own and within 2 Bianchi and Henrekson (2005) provide a systematic overview and evaluation of these modelling attempts. organizations to: (i) perceive and create new…”
Foundations of High Impact Entrepreneurship (2008, background): “The inventor’s share— collected either in a higher wage or some other means of remuneration—would be bounded on the lower end by the return that the agent could expect to earn if he launched a new enterprise for the innovation and on the upper end by the expected value of the innovation if implement”
Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Management in Large Organizations: Toward a Theory of the (Entrepreneurial) Firm (2016, background): “6 See Bianchi and Henrekson (2005) for a review of neoclassical models that have included some aspect of entrepreneurship.”
What Kind of Entrepreneurship Drives Regional Development in European Non-core Regions? A Literature Review on Empirical Entrepreneurship Research (2013, background): “…from the small-business-and-firm-foundation perspective highlights the role of the “entrepreneur” ignored for a long time in neoclassical economics (Bianchi & Henrekson, 2005; Casson, 2003; Kirzner, 1973), and it focuses on abilities and activities associated with “the entrepreneur” (Drucker,…”
The Economics of Entrepreneurship: What We Know and What We Don't (2005, background): “But as Bianchi and Henrekson [27] point out, this literature does not capture the existence of Schumpeter’s “extraordinary individual” (the entrepreneur) who is responsible for the innovation, instead it focuses on firms that devote resources to large-scale “routinized” R&D activities.”
Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence (2008, background): “As numerous writers ⎯ from Hayek (1946) over Baumol (1968) to Bianchi and Henrekson (2005) ⎯ have lamented, the real world importance of entrepreneurs is, however, not reflected in economic theorizing.”