A Continuous Dilemma âˆ

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Infinitely repeated games in the laboratory: four perspectives on discounting and random termination (2016, unknown): “9Fudenberg et al. [2012], however, do not find that risk dominance correlates with choices in an infinitely repeated game with noise (imperfect public monitoring).”
Intelligence, Personality, and Gains from Cooperation in Repeated Interactions (2019, background): “increase the possibility of coordinating on the most profitable cooperative equilibria, while Friedman and Oprea (2012) show that when agents are able to adjust in continuous time, cooperation rates are higher.”
On the Determinants of Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games: A Survey (2018, methodology): “Two recent experiments on games in continuous time are Friedman and Oprea (2012) and Bigoni, Camera, and Casari (2013).”
Do short-term laboratory experiments provide valid descriptions of long-term economic interactions? A study of Cournot markets (2013, unknown): “Recently, Friedman and Oprea (2012) found almost 90 percent cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma with (nearly) continuous time.”
Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma (2018, unknown): “…threshold strategies has been noted in the previous literature (for instance theoretically in Radner (1986) and recently empirically investigated in Friedman & Oprea (2012)), we find convergence to using threshold strategies to be a critical and systematic feature of the evolution of behavior in…”