Analyzing valid inequalities of the generation unit commitment problem

By Kory W. Hedman, Richard P. O'Neill, Shmuel S. Oren. IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2009

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tight and Compact MILP Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem (2013, background): “These two formulations have been recognized as computationally efficient in the literature [9], [19], [21], [22], [28].”
A Convex Primal Formulation for Convex Hull Pricing (2016, unknown): “esent the relationship between commitment variables x g and start-up variables u g: u gt ≥ x gt − x g,t−1, ∀t ∈ [2,T]. (13) Variousformulations ofminimum up/down timeconstraints exist inthe literature[HOO09]. A tight formulation is found in [RT05]: Xt i=t−Lg+1 u gi ≤ x gt, ∀t ∈ [L g +1,T], (14) Xt i”
A new MILP based approach for unit commitment in power production planning (2013, background): “Still within the scope of MILP formulations for the UCP, a study on the quality of previously proposed valid inequalities was conducted in [19].”