The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion

By G. Marcus, Michael B. Mackuen, Jennifer Wolak, Luke Keele. 2006

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right: Evidence From the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks (2018, background): “They are not expected to be orthogonal and indeed the evidence shows them to be both coactive and highly correlated (Marcus et al., 2006, 2017).”
It's My Campaign I'll Cry if I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals (2011, methodology): “When using the disposition system, individuals will rely on routine, or in a political situation, partisanship (Marcus et al., 2000; Marcus et al., 2006).”
Applying the Theory of Affective Intelligence to Support for Authoritarian Policies and Parties (2019, methodology): “” As with any threat stimulus, we expect that fear and anger will be concurrent pertinent appraisals (MacKuen et al., 2010; Marcus, Neumann, & MacKuen, 2017; Marcus et al., 2006).”
Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality (2010, background): “Upon activation, anger is expected to reinforce rather than suspend habits (Marcus 2002; Marcus et al. 2006).”
The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a Function of Political Sophistication (2011, background): “Scholars disagree about the dimensions that should characterize multidimensional models (Marcus et al. 2006; Neuman et al. 2007).”