Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant.

By R. Green, N. Lovell, Gordon G. Wallace, L. Poole-Warren. Biomaterials, 2008

667 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51c26dee412bac7f19e812040572244f537a17e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. Seeram Ramakrishna
2. Christoph Weder
3. Mehdi Jorfi
4. John Skousen
5. Jeffrey R. Capadona

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Christoph Weder
2. Mehdi Jorfi
3. John Skousen
4. Jeffrey R. Capadona

In Polymers and Plastics

1. Jeffrey R. Capadona
2. Christoph Weder
3. Seeram Ramakrishna

Citations in the corpus

• Polypyrrole-Coated Electrospun PLGA Nanofibers for Neural Tissue Applications (2009, neutral): “In addition, PPy doped with small anions has been reported to be brittle, which would be an obstacle for long-term performance with electrical stimulation through the scaffolds [34].”
• Progress Towards Biocompatible Intracortical Microelectrodes for Neural Interfacing Applications (2014, background): “(309) Therefore, developing conducting polymers that are less brittle and more malleable while maintaining the conductivity and avoid delamination over time is required.”
• Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering (2011, background): “Addition of bioactive factors to conducting polymers is considered a major strategy in improving cell–tissue interactions (Green et al., 2008).”