Understanding civil war : evidence and analysis

By Paul Collier, Nicholas Sambanis. 2005

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51795afc43ad804bd95ff81d32d3fc3d700140b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Lars-Erik Cederman
2. Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
3. Michael L. Ross
4. Christopher Claassen
5. Michael K. Miller
6. J. Colgan
7. S. Bermeo
8. Håvard Hegre

Citations in the corpus

• Introduction to Special Issue on “Disaggregating Civil War” (2009, background): “In an edited two-volume study, Collier and Sambanis (2005a, 2005b) present a series of case studies that probe the validity of Collier and Hoeffler’s (2004) well known model of civil war onset.”
• A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War (2006, background): “Some authors are interested in commenting on, modifying, or refuting the claims of the initial Collier-Hoeffler model (Samset 2002, Collier & Sambanis 2005, Pearce 2005); some develop theoretical frameworks of their own (Peluso & Watts 2001, Lowi 2004).”