Introduction to Special Issue on “Disaggregating Civil War”

By Lars-Erik Cederman, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2009

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f24d1ed1e771a7b205f1cf68877c76bd8c12468e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Halvard Buhaug
2. Håvard Strand
3. Marijke Verpoorten

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Halvard Buhaug
2. Håvard Strand
3. Marijke Verpoorten
4. A. Tøllefsen

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Armed Conflict on Economic Performance (2015, background): “Cederman and Gleditsch (2009), for instance, show how ‘‘disaggregating civil war’’ can yield new insights into the causes of conflicts.”
• Demand, supply, and restraint: Determinants of domestic water conflict and cooperation (2014, unknown): “This analysis is based on aggregated country-level data, but it is not unlikely that a more nuanced high-resolution assessment (see Cederman and Gleditsch, 2009; Fjelde and von Uexkull, 2012; Wischnath and Buhaug, 2014) may uncover new dynamics of supply, demand, and restraint-side drivers of…”
• PRIO-GRID: A unified spatial data structure (2012, background): “Indeed, Cederman & Gleditsch (2009: 488) argue that ‘many of the non-findings and conun-drums in the existing cross-national research on civil war . . . follow at least partly from the near exclusive reliance on country-level attributes.’”