THE CRIME-CONTROL EFFECT OF INCARCERATION: DOES SCALE MATTER?*
By Raymond V. Liedka, A. Piehl, Bert Useem. 2006
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5166ff29e2601b39d84b3ec7c0151e999a217d7d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
- Sara Wakefield
- D. Kirk
- Dan Nagin
- R. Rosenfeld
- Alex R. Piquero
- Paul Nieuwbeerta
- Greg Pogarsky
- Arjan A. J. Blokland
Citations in the corpus
- Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century (2013, methodology): “However, the magnitude of the estimate varied widely: from nil for a study that allowed for the possibility that prevention effects decline as the scale of imprisonment increases (Liedka, Piehl, and Useem 2006) to 0.4 percent for each 1 percent increase in the imprisonment rate (Spelman 2000).”
- Collateral Consequences of Punishment: A Critical Review and Path Forward (2018, background): “Such estimates are non-trivial but these benefits leveled off in the early 1990s ( Johnson & Raphael 2012, Levitt 1996, Liedka et al. 2006, Raphael & Stoll 2009).”
- Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, unknown): “Merck ZLI 1132 which is a eutectic mixture of 1,4-(trans-4 0 -n-alkylcyclohexyl)-cyanobenzene (alkyl = propyl, pentyl, heptyl) and 1,4-(trans-4 0 -n-pentylcyclohexyl )-cyanobiphenyl, N-(4-ethoxybenzylidene)- 4 0 -n-butylaniline (EBBA), and a 'magic mixture' with composition 55 wt% Merck ZLI 1132 /…”
- Crime is the Problem: Homicide, Acquisitive Crime, and Economic Conditions (2009, background): “Prior research has revealed significant effects of imprisonment on both property and violent crime rates (Levitt 1996; Liedka et al. 2006; Marvell and Moody 1994).”