HiZELS: a high-redshift survey of Hα emitters – I. The cosmic star formation rate and clustering at z= 2.23

By James E. Geach, I. Smail, P. Best, J. Kurk, M. Casali, R. Ivison, K. Coppin. 2008

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results from a near-infrared narrow-band survey of emission-line galaxies at z = 2.23, using the Wide Field Camera on the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope. The H2S1 narrow-band filter ( �c = 2.121µm) we employ selects the Hemission line redshifted to z = 2.23, and is thus suitable for selecting 'typical' star forming g alaxies and active galactic nuclei at this epoch. The pilot study was undertaken in the well studied Cosmological Evolution Survey field (COSMOS) and is already the largest near-infrar ed narrow-band survey at this depth, with a line flux limit of FH� � 10 −16 erg s −1 cm −2 over 0.60 square degrees, probing �220× 10 3 Mpc 3 (co-moving) down to a limiting star formation rate of �30M⊙ yr −1 (3�). In this paper we present the results from our pilot survey and evaluate the Hluminosity function and estimate the clustering properties of Hemitters at z = 2.23 from 55 detected galaxies. The integrated luminosity function is used to est imate the volume averaged star formation rate at z = 2.23: �SFR = 0.17 +0.16 −0.09M⊙ yr −1 Mpc −3 for LH� > 10 42 erg s −1 . For the first time, we use the Hstar-formation tracer to reliably constrainSFR out to z = 2.23 demonstrating the rapid increase inSFR out to this redshift as well as confirming the flattening inSFR betweenz � 1-2. In addition to the luminosity distribution, we analyse t he clustering properties of these galaxies. Using the 2-point angular correlation function, !(�), we estimate a real space correlation length of r0 = 4.2 +0.4 −0.2 h −1 Mpc. In comparison to models of clustering which take into account bias evolution, we estimate that these galaxies are hosted by dark matter halos of mass Mhalo � 10 12 M⊙ consistent with the progenitors of the Milky

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51471808388b80a2202381cce06af848128e6b95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. I. Labbé
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. G. Illingworth
  8. M. Kriek

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. I. Labbé
  4. M. Kriek
  5. G. Brammer
  6. G. Illingworth
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. Naveen A. Reddy

Citations in the corpus