How predictable is technological progress

By J. D. Farmer, Doyne Farmera, François Lafonda, François Lafond, Christopher L. Smith, J. Alstott, M. Totten. 2015

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Recently it has become clear that many technologies follow a generalized version of Moore's law, i.e. costs tend to drop exponentially, at different rates that depend on the technology. Here we formulate Moore's law as a correlated geometric random walk with drift, and apply it to historical data on 53 technologies. We derive a closed form expression approximating the distribution of forecast errors as a function of time. Based on hind-casting experiments we show that this works well, making it possible to collapse the forecast errors for many different technologies at different time horizons onto the same universal distribution. This is valuable because it allows us to make forecasts for any given technology with a clear understanding of the quality of the forecasts. As a practical demonstration we make distributional forecasts at different time horizons for solar photovoltaic modules, and show how our method can be used to estimate the probability that a given technology will outperform another technology at a given point in the future.

Subfields: Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

  1. Inês Lima Azevedo
  2. P. Jaramillo
  3. J. D. Farmer
  4. Cameron Hepburn
  5. Frank H. Westerhoff
  6. Cars H. Hommes
  7. Jim Gatheral

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Owain Evans
  2. Inês Lima Azevedo
  3. P. Jaramillo
  4. K. Caldeira
  5. J. D. Farmer
  6. Alexander Teytelboym
  7. Thomas H. Bradley
  8. Jessika E. Trancik

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Owain Evans

Citations in the corpus