The Casualties of `Casual' Sex: A Qualitative Exploration of the Phenomenology of College Students' Hookups

By E. Paul, Kristen A. Hayes. 2002

446 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50eea9df1bb92d9c3dd063d80056c365ce8f24a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Gender Studies

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships (2005, background): “Several researchers have examined the phenomenon of casual sex on college campuses (Herold, Maticka-Tyndale, & Mewhinney, 1998; Lambert, Kahn, & Apple, 2003; Paul & Hayes, 2002; Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000), but few bave specifically explored FWBRs.”
‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard (2017, background): “Such individuals may be friends or acquaintances, or may have met on the same day as the sexual exchange (Herold & Mewhinney, 1993; Paul & Hayes, 2002; Wentland & Reissing, 2011).”
For better or worse: Exploring the meanings of same-sex marriage within the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered community (2005, methodology): “These questions attempt to elicit a wide range of participants’ understanding of same-sex marriage and the community using a technique similar to that in Paul and Hayes’ (2002) exploration of college students’ hookups.”
Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. (2008, background): “Alcohol and other drugs often facilitate hook-up experiences (Lambert, Kahn, & Apple 2003; Paul & Hayes 2002 ) and drastically increase the overall risks (Abbey, Ross, McDuffie, & McAuslan, 1996).”
Hooking Up in Young Adulthood: A Review of Factors Influencing the Sexual Behavior of College Students (2010, background): “Unwanted Sexual Experiences Given that hookup encounters are partly attributable to excessive alcohol consumption and conforming to peer norms, it is very likely that many students have engaged or are engaging in sexual experiences that they do not desire (Paul & Hayes, 2002).”
Risky Situation or Harmless Fun? A Qualitative Examination of College Women’s Bad Hook-up and Rape Scripts (2009, background): “Another example of this type of relationship is a “hook-up,” generally defined as a spontaneous sexual encounter, with or without sexual intercourse, between two individuals with no prior romantic relationship ( Paul and Hayes 2002; Paul et al. 2000).”
The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood (2013, background): “…from nearly 65% to approximately 80% of undergraduate participants reporting having engaged in a hook up at least once in their college career (England, Shafer, and Fogarty, 2007; Garcia & Reiber, 2008; Lambert et al., 2003; Paul & Hayes, 2002; Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000; Reiber & Garcia, 2010).”
Sexual Assault Victims' Acknowledgment Status and Revictimization Risk (2009, background): “This may reflect the current frequency of casual sexual encounters, such as hook-ups, on college campuses (e.g., Paul & Hayes, 2002; Paul, McManus, & Hayes, 2000).”
To Hook Up or Date: Which Gender Benefits? (2010, methodology): “ Paul and Hayes (2002) found that 75% of men and 84% of women had hooked up during their college career, with a mean of 10.28 hook ups.”
Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation (2005, background): “Speaking to the validity of Glass and Wright’s typology, Paul and Hayes (2002) relate the account of a student who described a hook-up as producing a boost to self-esteem and self-confidence.”
Has Dating Become More Egalitarian? A 35 Year Review Using Sex Roles (2011, background): “Dating is no longer the direct path to marriage that it once was (Libby 1976), nor is dating the only, or even primary, type of initial romantic encounter young singles engage in today (e.g., Bailey 1988; Paul and Hayes 2002).”