What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships

By M. Hughes, K. Morrison, K. J. Asada. 2005

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cef09d5dfdb633039fc85e2841f220a3faf0595

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. T. Backstrom
2. E. Canales
3. Holly E. Tabernik
4. H. Littleton
5. Diane H Felmlee

In Social Psychology

1. H. Colleen Sinclair
2. Diane H Felmlee
3. E. Sweet

Citations in the corpus

• Risky Situation or Harmless Fun? A Qualitative Examination of College Women’s Bad Hook-up and Rape Scripts (2009, background): “Finally, 55% of a sample of US college students reported that they had been in a “friends with benefits” relationship at least once ( Hughes et al. 2005 ).”
• Gender Rules: Same- and Cross-Gender Friendships Norms (2012, background): “Cultural scripts have yet to catch up with the times, however, and models of men and women relating in a platonic context are rarer than those of them interacting in sexualized situations, even within friendships (Baumgarte 2002; Hughes et al. 2005).”
• Casual sexual relationships: Identifying definitions for one night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies, and friends with benefits (2014, background): “The Friends with Benefits relationship, in particular, has received considerable attention (e.g., Bisson & Levine, 2009; Hughes et al., 2005; Lehmiller, VanderDrift, & Kelly, 2014; Mongeau et al., 2013; Quirk, Owen, & Fincham, 2014).”