SPECIES CO‐OCCURRENCE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF J. M. DIAMOND'S ASSEMBLY RULES MODEL

By Nicholas Gotelli, D. McCabe. 2002

1,047 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50e6f515112a2c11b534a67b4b95e8d7b74fbba2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Null models for species co-occurrence patterns: assessing bias and minimum iteration number for the sequential swap (2006, background): “Analysing co-occurrence data has become a common practice in ecology to study the community structure within single observations (Gotelli et al. 1987) as well as to verify general ecological theories by using meta- analysis of co-occurrence matrices (Gotelli and McCabe 2002).”
Microbial community structure and its functional implications (2009, background): “Community assembly 'rules' Co-occurrence patterns of organisms — examining which organisms sometimes or never occur together — have been used to reveal community assembly rule”
Changes in assembly rules along a stress gradient from open dry grasslands to wetlands (2016, background): “S4), standardized effect sizes (Gotelli & McCabe 2002) are inappropriate to measure the strength of convergence/divergence (Ulrich & Gotelli 2010; Bernard-Verdier et al. 2012).”
Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly (2004, background): “…provide related interaction metrics both for two-species systems (Forbes 1907; Dice 1945; Cole 1949; Pielou 1977; Hayek 1994) and for more complex multispecies systems (Connor & Simberloff 1979, 1984; Gilpin & Diamond 1982, 1984; Kelt et al. 1995; Manly 1995; Gotelli 2000; Gotelli & McCabe 2002).”
Species co-occurrences and neutral models: reassessing J. M. Diamond's assembly rules (2004, methodology): “A comparison of the neutral model results with the results of Gotelli and McCabe (2002) would also be a test for the neutral model approach.”
Bat flies: Obligate ectoparasites of bats (2006, result): “These results may indicate a mutualistic relationship among co-occurring flies, and contrast with some other parasite co-occurrence studies, in which density compensation seems to be the rule (Gotelli and McCabe 2002; Gotelli and Rohde 2002; Fellis et al. 2003).”
Null Versus Neutral Models: What's The Difference? (2006, result): “The predictions of the neutral model are more in line with empirical patterns described for marine ectoparasites (SES /0.35; Gotelli and Rohde (2002)), which show little evidence for competitive structuring (Morand et al. 1999).”
Modeling Species and Community Responses to Past, Present, and Future Episodes of Climatic and Ecological Change (2015, background): “At the most basic level, community assembly or patterns of species co-occurrence/coexclusion can arise from two main causes: (a) similar/dissimilar environmental requirements (Peres-Neto 2004, Ovaskainen et al. 2010) and (b) ecological interactions among species (Gotelli & McCabe 2002).”
Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities (2014, background): “Community patterns most often deviate from those expected under null models, although the magnitude of such deviations varies greatly (Gotelli and McCabe 2002).”
An Ant Mosaic Revisited: Dominant Ant Species Disassemble Arboreal Ant Communities but Co‐Occur Randomly (2007, background): “…evidence for the structuring role of competition in ant communities comes from examining spatial distributions of species (Jackson 1984, Adams 1994, Gotelli & McCabe 2002, Sanders et al. 2003) and the impact of competitively dominant species on community structure (Savolainen & Vepsäläinen 1988,…”