An Ant Mosaic Revisited: Dominant Ant Species Disassemble Arboreal Ant Communities but Co‐Occur Randomly

By N. Sanders, G. Crutsinger, R. Dunn, Jonathan D. Majer, J. Delabie. 2007

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e455112df545ab906d0b762321da3988b2dc5da6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Leponce
2. J. Orivel
3. A. Dejean
4. B. Corbara
5. J. Delabie
6. S. Philpott

In Genetics

1. M. Leponce
2. J. Orivel
3. A. Dejean
4. B. Corbara
5. J. Delabie
6. S. Philpott

In Insect Science

1. M. Leponce
2. A. Dejean
3. J. Orivel
4. B. Corbara
5. J. Delabie
6. S. Philpott

Citations in the corpus

• Contribution of cocoa plantations to the conservation of native ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with a special emphasis on the Atlantic Forest fauna of southern Bahia, Brazil (2007, background): “…interacting ant species become numerically dominant in a given site or habitat, therein generating a horizontal and/or vertical stratification or mosaic formed by their non-overlapping territories (see the reviews of Majer 1993; Dejean et al. 2003; and the criticisms by Sanders et al. 2007).”
• Rainforest Canopy Ants: The Implications of Territoriality and Predatory Behavior (2007, methodology): “Despite its use in other studies (Ribas and Schoereder 2004; Floren and Linsenmair 2005; Sanders et al. 2007), we therefore recommend not using this randomization algorithm to detect ant mosaics.”