Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performance response and mode of action
By C. Krehbiel, S. Rust, Guolong Zhang, S. Gilliland. 2003
391 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Infectious Diseases
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50e5e93bfec9d6ca0c06174c7649711b12cd4886
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
Citations in the corpus
- Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. (2010, result): “In beef cattle, the overall results led Krehbiel et al. (2003) to conclude that probiotics, potentially, increase some growth parameters when fed to finishing cattle; however, effects on performance have not been consistent.”
- Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. (2013, positive): “A meta-analysis by Krehbiel et al. (2003) reported a generally positive trend for improved health in young, growing dairy or beef cattle treated with various DFM (mainly based on Lactobacillus and Streptococcus and in some cases Propionibacterium spp.).”
- Direct-fed microbials for ruminant animals. (2010, background): “Both dairy and beef cattle fed DFM showed improved growth performance, milk and meat production, and feed efficiency in many experiments (Ghorbani et al., 2002; Nocek et al., 2002; Krehbiel et al., 2003; Stein et al., 2006).”