TO S PIN O R N OT TO SPIN? N ATURAL AND LABORATORY E XPERIMENTS FROM THE PRICE I S R IGHT *

By Rafael Tenorio, Timothy N. Cason. 2002

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50c93cb6295886c40a06c8165398d3e37d099078

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. John A. List
2. Daniel John Zizzo
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. Fredrik Carlsson
5. Imran Rasul
6. Daniel Kahneman
7. J. Ladenburg
8. Thomas Brown

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. John A. List
2. Jackson Loomis
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. James J. Murphy
5. Thomas Stevens
6. J. Ladenburg
7. Thomas Brown
8. F. Norwood

In Safety Research

1. John A. List
2. Imran Rasul
3. Daniel John Zizzo
4. Armin Falk
5. Ernst Fehr
6. Thomas Brown
7. Fredrik Carlsson
8. Eugen Dimant

Citations in the corpus

• The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List (2011, unknown): “In the field data and in a lab replica, subjects fail to take a second spin frequently when they should spin, in both field and lab [Tenorio and Cason, 2002].”
• Young, selfish, and male: Field evidence of social preferences (2004, background): “For example, Berk et al. (1996) and Tenorio and Cason (2002) study contestants’ behaviour on The Price Is Right to investigate rational decision theory and whether subjects play the unique subgame perfect Nash equilibrium.”
• Do Consumers Switch to the Best Supplier (2007, unknown): “Such behaviour is wholly consistent with an explanation of high search costs or with the experimental evidence that proposes consumers often search too little (Sonnemans 1998 and Tenorio and Cason 2002).”