Cloud tuning in a coupled climate model: Impact on 20th century warming
By J. Golaz, L. Horowitz, H. Levy. 2013
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5073b5ec79bf78f2204d8024c99e392f7a6bffcd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Tapio Schneider
- L. Harris
- Robert Hallberg
- S. Griffies
- Shian‐Jiann Lin
- I. Held
- T. Andrews
- Andrew T. Wittenberg
In Global and Planetary Change
- Tapio Schneider
- Shian‐Jiann Lin
- L. Harris
- T. Andrews
- S. Griffies
- Robert Hallberg
- Alistair Adcroft
- P. Phillipps
Citations in the corpus
- The GFDL Earth System Model Version 4.1 (GFDL‐ESM 4.1): Overall Coupled Model Description and Simulation Characteristics (2020, background): “This model was found to have a high overall climate sensitivity to both aerosols and greenhouse gases with moderate cooling in the latter half of the 20th century followed by rapid warming around the turn of the 21st century (e.g., Golaz et al., 2013).”
- Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High‐Resolution Simulations (2017, methodology): “…sizes in a cloud, the fraction of cloud condensate that precipitates out, and the phase partitioning of cloud condensate into liquid and ice [e.g., Stainforth et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2012; Suzuki et al., 2013; Golaz et al., 2013; Bodas-Salcedo et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016; Kay et al., 2016].”
- The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 2. Model Description, Sensitivity Studies, and Tuning Strategies (2018, background): “0 which likely would negatively affect coupled model simulations of historical temperature trend in a way similar to CM3 (Golaz et al., 2013).”
- Improved Aerosol Processes and Effective Radiative Forcing in HadGEM3 and UKESM1 (2018, methodology): “This problem is not unique to the HadGEM3 model; for example, Golaz et al. (2013) doc- ument a similar issue in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory climate model.”
- Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change (2020, background): “…with1444 the most negative aerosol ERFs exhibit behavior that calls their fidelity into question,1445 such as a much smaller warming than observed for many time periods of the 20th cen-1446 tury (Golaz et al., 2013) or unrealistic pattern in aerosol radiative effects (Stevens & Fiedler,1447 2017).”