The evolution of the broad-line region among SDSS quasars

By Tohru Nagao, A. Marconi, Roberto Maiolino Arcetri Observatory, National Space Development Agency of Japan. 2005

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Based on 5344 quasar spectra taken from the SDSS Data Release 2, the dependences of various emission-line flux ratios on redshift and quasar luminosity are investigated in the ranges $2.0 \leq z \leq 4.5$ and $-24.5 \geq M_B \geq -29.5$. We show that the emission lines in the composite spectra are fitted better with power-law profiles than with double Gaussian or modified Lorentzian profiles, and in particular we show that the power-law profiles are more appropriate to measure broad emission-line fluxes than other methods. The composite spectra show that there are statistically significant correlations between quasar luminosity and various emission-line flux ratios, such as Nv/Civ and Nv/Heii, while there are only marginal correlations between quasar redshift and emission-line flux ratios. We obtain detailed photoionization models to interpret the observed line ratios. The correlation of line ratios with luminosity is interpreted in terms of higher gas metallicity in more luminous quasars. For a given quasar luminosity, there is no metallicity evolution for the redshift range $2.0 \leq z \leq 4.5$. The typical metallicity of BLR gas clouds is estimated to be $Z \sim 5~ Z_\odot$, although the inferred metallicity depends on the assumed BLR cloud properties, such as their density distribution function and their radial distribution. The absence of a metallicity evolution up to $z \sim 4.5$ implies that the active star-formation epoch of quasar host galaxies occurred at $z \ga 7$.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5050d4280286fd139b5c74930cf8f5916c6f1ce8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. H. Netzer
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Xiaohui Fan
  6. D. M. Alexander
  7. M. Strauss
  8. Jenny E. Greene

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. F. Mannucci
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. G. Cresci
  4. Xiaohui Fan
  5. F. Walter
  6. M. Strauss
  7. B. Peterson
  8. M. Vestergaard

In Instrumentation

  1. H. Netzer
  2. R. Maiolino
  3. B. Kelly
  4. F. Mannucci
  5. Xiaohui Fan
  6. M. Strauss
  7. M. Vestergaard
  8. F. Walter

Citations in the corpus