Sources and Magnitude of Sampling Error in Redd Counts for Bull Trout

By J. B. Dunham, B. Rieman, K. Davis. 2001

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50504ee8be76b6255d0a1cd49d0890cd8ec005c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. B. Dunham
2. B. Rieman
3. R. Thurow
4. F. Allendorf
5. Daniel J. Isaak
6. M. Young
7. J. Rosenfeld

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. B. Dunham
2. B. Rieman
3. R. Thurow
4. F. Allendorf
5. Daniel J. Isaak
6. M. Young
7. K. Fausch
8. R. Gresswell

In Water Science and Technology

1. B. Rieman
2. J. B. Dunham

Citations in the corpus

• Effective Population Size and Genetic Conservation Criteria for Bull Trout (2001, background): “The largest local spawning aggregations we are aware of contain between several hundred and several thousand adults (Rieman and McIntyre 1993; Dunham et al. 2001).”
• Network-scale spatial and temporal variation in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) redd distributions: patterns inferred from spatially continuous replicate surveys (2006, background): “Stream shading, habitat complexity, turbidity, and redd superimposition can affect the accuracy of redd counts ( Dunham et al. 2001 ), but ongoing validation work suggests the relationship between aerial counts and “true” counts based on more reliable ground surveys is strong (r = 0.78, n = 52 reach”
• Validation of Abundance Estimates from Mark–Recapture and Removal Techniques for Rainbow Trout Captured by Electrofishing in Small Streams (2005, background): “The latter is particularly difficult to quantify (e.g., Dunham et al. 2001).”