Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell's monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli

By K. Zuberbühler. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2001

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5005741db03a523f9e184cc7d06a63031d3cc6d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini (2006, methodology): “Male putty-nosed monkeys produced loud calls in response to playbacks of predators and, as in other forest guenons (Zuberbühler et al. 1997; Zuberbühler 2000a, 2001; Eckhardt & Zuberbühler 2004), these responses consisted of a series of calls.”
Chapter 8 Survivor Signals (2009, background): “One alarm call type is mainly given to crowned eagles, while another type ismainly given to leopards (Zuberbühler, 2001).”
Context-specific calls in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus: analysis of barks (2003, background): “The occurrence of such calls in alarm contexts has been documented in several primate species (Fischer 1998; Zuberbühler 2000, 2001; reviewed in Hauser 1996), suricates, Suricata suricatta (Manser 2001) and chickens, Gallus g. domesticus (Evans et al. 1993) and in social aggression contexts in two…”
A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication (2002, background): “In their natural rainforest habitat, male Campbell’s monkeys produce two acoustically distinct alarm call types, one to crowned-hawk eagles (the ‘eagle’ alarm call) and another one to leopards (the ‘leopard’ alarm call; Zuberbühler 2001).”
Referential mobbing calls elicit different predator-searching behaviours in Japanese great tits (2012, background): “…structure of alarm calls can vary with the nature of the predator, such as predator type (Seyfarth et al. 1980; Macedonia 1990; Evans et al. 1993; Zuberbühler 2000, 2001; Manser 2001), distance (Blumstein & Armitage 1997; Manser 2001; Fichtel & Kappeler 2002; Leavesley & Magrath 2005) and…”
Functionally Referential Alarm Calls in Tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax) – Evidence from Playback Experiments (2006, background): “Functionally referential alarm call systems have been found among primates in three cercopithecine species (Cercopithecus aethiops: Seyfarth et al. 1980; C. diana and C. campbelli: Zuberbühler et al. 1997; Zuberbühler 2001) and in ring-tailed lemurs (L. catta: Macedonia 1990).”
Production and perception of situationally variable alarm calls in wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) (2010, background): “…that terrestrial and aerial predators, respectively, elicit distinct alarm call types (e.g., Seyfarth et al. 1980; Macedonia and Evans 1993; Zuberbühler 2000, 2001; Fichtel and Kappeler 2002; Range and Fischer 2004; Digweed et al. 2005; Ouattara et al. 2009a; Schel et al. 2009), in…”
An avian eavesdropping network: alarm signal reliability and heterospecific response (2009, background): “For example, Diana and Campbell’s monkeys (Cercopithecus diana and Cercopithecus campbelli) respond to playback of each other’s alarm calls (Zuberbühler 2000, 2001), as do yellowbellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) and golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis; Shriner 1998).”
Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system (2002, background): “In fact, vocal responses to such playbacks have been highly variable in other primate species, with vervet monkeys exhibiting a vocal response in only 1 out of more than 200 playbacks ( Zuberbuhler 2001 ).”
The alarm call system of wild black-fronted titi monkeys, Callicebus nigrifrons (2012, background): “…responses in recipients, researchers typically conclude that the utterance conveys something about the event experienced by the caller, although the nature of this experience has remained controversial (e.g., Seyfarth et al. 1980b; Zuberbühler et al. 1997; Zuberbühler 2001; Rendall et al. 2009).”