The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini

By Kate Arnold, K. Zuberbühler. 2006

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4bdbf52a903c438c2a4c68f9f14bb5c43f2c747

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Food-associated vocalizations in mammals and birds: what do these calls really mean? (2012, background): “…types may also be given in other circumstances, including in response to nonpredatory disturbances (i.e. falling trees and nonpredatory animals: Arnold & Zuberbühler 2006; Wheeler 2010), and in response to social disturbances, such as agonistic encounters with other conspecific groups (Fichtel…”
What do animal signals mean (2009, background): “…and referential quality of primate signals continue apace (Hauser 1998; Zuberbühler 2000a, 2003; Di Bitetti 2003; Slocombe & Zuberbühler 2005; Arnold & Zuberbühler 2006a, b) and, in fact, have spread to include a variety of more distantly related mammals and birds (e.g. meerkats, Suricata…”
Mobbing behaviour in birds: costs and reciprocity based cooperation (2007, background): “Since mobbing can be often observed as a community level event with more than one prey species involved (Arnold & Zuberbühler 2006), it may be admitted that prey individuals belonging to different species may be involved in the reciprocity-based cooperation when defending their offspring.”
Semantic communication in birds: evidence from field research over the past two decades (2016, background): “Finally, like several Cercopithecusmonkeys (Arnold and Zuberbühler 2006b), several species of birds can combine different sounds into more highly structured sequences in a context-dependent manner.”
Vocal Repertoire of Cebus capucinus: Acoustic Structure, Context, and Usage (2008, background): “…trill during group movement or to initiate group movement, and coo/lost call by infants separated from their mothers, may provide information different from calls produced individually (Arnold and Zuberbühler 2006; Crockford and Boesch 2005; Zuberbühler 2002), thereby increasing call diversity.”
The alarm call system of wild black-fronted titi monkeys, Callicebus nigrifrons (2012, background): “…Templeton et al. 2005), but in others, the nature of the danger encountered is reflected by the number of calls per sequence (Schel et al. 2009), the rate of call delivery (Lemasson et al. 2010), the intensity of calls (Blumstein 1999), or by combinations of calls (Arnold and Zuberbühler 2006a, b).”
Communication about predator type by a bird using discrete, graded and combinatorial variation in alarm calls (2014, background): “For example, putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini, combine acoustically discrete calls into a fixed sequence depending on the type of predators that they encountered (Arnold & Zuberbühler, 2006a, 2008).”
Chapter 8 Survivor Signals (2009, background): “…are reliably given to crowned eagles, ‘‘pyows’’ are given to leopards, although the match between predator category and call type is far from perfect (Arnold and Zuberbühler, 2006a), in contrast to other primates’ alarm call system such as Diana or vervet monkeys (Seyfarth et al., 1980;…”
Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat (2010, background): “Many animals utter alarm calls when they encounter predators (Arnold and Zuberbuhler 2006; Frederiksen and Slobodchikoff 2007; Botham et al. 2008), and these calls may alert group members and kin of danger, call for assistance, or inform predators that they have been spotted and are no longer a thre”