The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability
By D. Ivanova, Richard Wood. Global Sustainability, 2020
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Non-technical summary The distribution of household carbon footprints is largely unequal within and across countries. Here, we explore household-level consumption data to illustrate the distribution of carbon footprints and consumption within 26 European Union countries, regions and social groups. The analysis further sheds light on the relationships between carbon footprints and socially desirable outcomes such as income, equality, education, nutrition, sanitation, employment and adequate living conditions. Technical summary We need a good understanding of household carbon distributions in order to design equitable carbon policy. In this work, we analyse household-level consumer expenditure from 26 European Union (EU) countries and link it with greenhouse gas (GHG) intensities from the multiregional input–output database EXIOBASE. We show carbon footprint distributions and elasticities by country, region and socio-economic group in the context of per capita climate targets. The top 10% of the population with the highest carbon footprints per capita account for 27% of the EU carbon footprint, a higher contribution to that of the bottom 50% of the population. The top 1% of EU households have a carbon footprint of 55 tCO2eq/cap. The most significant contribution is from air and land transport, with 41% and 21% among the top 1% of EU households. Air transport has a rising elasticity coefficient across EU expenditure quintiles, making it the most elastic, unequal and carbon-intensive consumption category in this study. Only 5% of EU households live within climate targets, with carbon footprints below 2.5 tCO2eq/cap. Our analysis points to the possibility of mitigating climate change while achieving various well-being outcomes. Further attention is needed to limit trade-offs between climate change mitigation and socially desirable outcomes. Social media summary EU top 1% of households emit 22 times the per capita climate targets. Only 5% of EU households live within the targets.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e43654f520172aec11a77774731478addc59030
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- D. Ivanova
- J. Barrett
- S. Gössling
- Felix Creutzig
- Andreas Humpe
- Dominik Wiedenhofer
- T. Wiedmann
- Manfred Lenzen
In Pollution
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options (2020, background): “The overall mitigation potentials strongly depend on income, as high-income households fly much more [4, 5, 65].”
- The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change (2020, background): “Further analysis of these distributions is warranted because of emerging debates of carbon inequality (Chakravarty et al., 2009; Chancel and Piketty, 2015; Hubacek et al., 2017; Ivanova and Wood, 2020), as well as airlines and air transport advocates’ presentation of air travel as an ubiquitous acti”