Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1

By Shumaila Y. Yousafzai, Gordon Foxall, John Pallister. 2007

604 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fba1ed1e7765c817207b256faf9395bd5dca20a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics (2018, background): “19,20 Also, the TAM is one of the most popular research models to predict use, person ’ s intention to perform a particular behavior, and acceptance of information systems and technology by individual users.”
THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL: ITS PAST AND ITS FUTURE IN HEALTH CARE (2009, neutral): “As reviewed elsewhere [33,34,54,55], many other revisions have been suggested to TAM and some past revisions have been questioned, but the three TAM descendents described above, and the general TPB, are the most commonly used.”
Effects of Restaurant Satisfaction and Knowledge Sharing Motivation on eWOM Intentions (2017, background): “As perceived risks, reliability, and accuracy are all demonstrated to be significant predictors of PU (Yousafzai et al., 2007), website operators should pay more attention to enhancing credibility of the source and consistency of information quality.”
Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India (2020, methodology): “In addition, this model could emerge as a preeminent model towards acceptance of technology having high explanative power (Yousafzai, Foxall, & Pallister, 2007; Maartje et al., 2017).”
A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type (2011, methodology): “This result is partially supported by previous meta-analysis studies conducted by King and He (2006), Yousafzai, Foxall, and Pallister (2007b) and Schepers and Wetzels (2007).”
How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers : a comparative analysis using scales and opinions (2017, background): “Despite its popularity, TAM has been criticized with regard to measure validation and measurements “resulting in conflicting and somewhat confusing findings which vary considerably in terms of statistical significance, direction and magnitude” (Yousafzai et al., 2007a, p.1746).”
User Acceptance of Virtual Reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model (2020, background): “…& Bouchard, 2008; Chow et al., 2012; Fetscherin & Lattemann, 2008; Tokel & İ sler, 2013), and corresponds to what has also been found in studies on various technologies such as word processors, emailers, and telemedicine technologies (see Yousafzai et al., 2007, for a meta-analysis of the TAM).”