The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities

By Shaker A. Zahra, Gerard George. Information systems research, 2002

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Absorptive Capacity and Information Systems Research: Review, Synthesis, and Directions for Future Research (2012, background): “In this manner, cohesion allows firms to readily apply new knowledge (Zahra and George 2002).”
A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors (2014, background): “Zahra and George (2002) Absorptive capacity and opportunity recognition • The importance of opportunity recognition and absorptive capacity in bringing about the changes that make NEBIC viable.”
*Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda (2006, background): “However, because learning is a path dependent process wherein what firms learn depends on what they already know (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990; Zahra & George, 2002a), how and what firms learn and how they change depends in part on the length of their history and the development stage of their…”
Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities (2006, background): “Growth in revenues includes sales from existing products and from new products and markets (Zahra and George 2002).”
Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research (2018, background): “In most cases, this type of application was associated (eg, von Krogh & Haefliger, 2010; Zahra & George, 2002).”