On control of the false discovery rate under no assumption of dependency

By Wenge Guo, M. Bhaskara Rao. 2008

56 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f906bfe6b28535b1d5bac2ac525bfabcf2d9369

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jelle J. Goeman
2. Aldo Solari
3. Fanny Villers
4. Étienne Roquain
5. Jesse Hemerik
6. Christina Heinze-Deml

In Statistics and Probability

1. Aldo Solari
2. Jelle J. Goeman
3. Fanny Villers
4. Étienne Roquain
5. Jesse Hemerik
6. Mark Rubin
7. Nicolai Meinshausen
8. Anders Gorst-rasmussen

Citations in the corpus

• Multiple hypothesis testing in genomics (2014, background): “Such ‘worst case’ distributions are often quite unrealistic, and this is especially true for Hommel’s inequality [23], which can be quite conservative for more realistic distributions.”
• Exact calculations for false discovery proportion with application to least favorable configurations (2010, background): “Interestingly, in general, Guo and Rao (2008) states that the BY bound can be fulfilled using very specific dependency structures between the p -values (not necessarily including those coming from a EMN model) [19].”