What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them
By Felicia Huppert. 2009
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f3c0d3da905fddc406da41f2200911fac6de54a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrew E. Clark
- Martin E. P. Seligman
- Eranda Jayawickreme
- Claudia Senik
- Luke Wayne Henderson
- Margaret L. Kern
- M. Forgeard
- T. Knight
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing (2012, background): “Despite these methodological improvements, Huta and Ryan (2010) distinguished eudaimonic and hedonic motives for participating in an activity from the individual’s actual experience of the activity.”
- Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy (2011, methodology): “Following collection of the data, Huppert and So (2009) derived an empirical definition of flourishing by looking at the percentage of respondents of the United Kingdom who endorsed the three core facets of wellbeing (positive emotion, engagement, meaning) as well as any three additional facets…”
- The Engine of Well-Being (2012, background): “More generally, our engine approach suggests that positive affect is useful as a process measure, but that the truly comprehensive theories and measures for public policy will need to include input and outcome variables as well (Hsee et al., 2008; So & Huppert, 2009).”
- Is happiness different from flourishing? Cross-Country Evidence from the ESS (2011, background): “Our first eudaimonic measure here is that of flourishing, as described in Huppert and So (2009). This is based on the answers to seven different well-being questions.”
- Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand Sample (2013, methodology): “…epidemiology of well-being, Huppert and So operationalized flourishing as the presence of positive emotions, engagement, and meaning/purpose, plus any three of six additional features (self-esteem, optimism, resilience, vitality, self-determination, and positive relationships; Huppert and So 2009).”