Modelling with stakeholders

By Alexey A. Voinov, François Bousquet. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2010

1,284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f1d02a99052c640b232ff449a449541bab2472e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Tools for Modeling of Stormwater Management and Economics of Green Infrastructure Practices: a Review (2014, background): “…introducing best practices such as introducing transparent modeling procedures, determining clear objectives of the GI implementation, and continuous involvement of the participants in each of the different stages of the planning process (Korfmacher 2001; Glasbergen 2002; Voinov and Bousquet 2010).”
The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling (2012, background): “This perspective offers a substantive rationale for 6 participatory modelling (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010, focussing on the instrumental 7 rationale), which will be discussed but is not the main focus of the paper.”
Characterising performance of environmental models (2013, background): “…the accuracy of its predictive power, but by other outcomes, including communityand capacity-building, and the ontological and educational functionality that it brings to groups of stakeholders or users who gain from being part of modelling process (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010; Krueger et al., 2012).”
Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover (2012, background): “…Geo-Wiki team of scientists must be active within this community, raising awareness of land cover issues; initiating campaigns; providing updates on the effects of collective user contributions; and generally guiding the crowd in a type of collaborative learning process (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
A social-ecological framework for analyzing and designing integrated crop–livestock systems from farm to territory levels (2016, positive): “design process to decipher this complexity (Steyaert and Jiggins, 2007; Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, background): “This issue creates a dilemma: claiming a “ neutral posture ” by inviting all relevant people may further strengthen the most powerful actors, while adopting a non-neutral posture to empower the weakest actors may compromise the legitimacy of the process (Barnaud and Van Paassen, 2013).”
ARDI: a co-construction method for participatory modelling in natural resources management (2011, background): “…produce better outcomes than classical top-down processes (Lynam et al. 2007, Reed 2008, 1INRA-Ecodevelopment Unit, 2AWARD Voinov and Brown 2008, Voinov and Bousquet 2010), particularly in terms of experiential learning about the issue, about solutions to technical problems, about other…”
Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future (2013, background): “The challenge is to foster and promote participation in a coordinated manner across the full community, which is often easier said than done (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
The Complexities of Agent-Based Modeling Output Analysis (2015, methodology): “This participatory modelling is a powerful strategy to facilitate decision-making, management, and consensus building (Voinov & Bousquet 2010).”
Potential applications of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) predictions (2017, background): “Scientists and users could co-develop tools and processes for fostering the joint development of S2S predictions, with stakeholder-based modelling (Voinov and Bousquet, 2010) or co-exploration/co-production processes (Lemos and Morehouse, 2005; Meadow et al.”
Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices (2011, background): “…are clear connections between the emphasis on users and use within this agenda and participatory or collaborative modelling, which focuses on bringing together multiple stakeholders to learn from each other and to jointly assess policy or management option impacts (see Voinov and Bousquet, 2010).”
Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management (2013, background): “…assessment models or tools to enhance the effectiveness of decision-making andmanagement has beenwidely acknowledged (see for example Bland, 1999; Voinov and Bousquet 2010; Carnevale et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2012; Jakeman and Letcher, 2003; Gough et al., 1998; Kragt et al., 2011; Liu et al.,…”