ARDI: a co-construction method for participatory modelling in natural resources management

By Michel E. Etienne, D. D. Toit, S. Pollard. 2011

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The outcomes of a series of tests of the ARDI (Actors, Resources, Dynamics and Interactions) method in complex cases or conflict-ridden situations is reported. ARDI is part of a companion modelling approach that makes it possible to engage a broad spectrum of stakeholders in the design and development of land and water management plans. It is essentially based on participatory workshops that set out to collaboratively imagine a future open, dynamic management system, capable of adaptation and anticipation, by gathering the various affected stakeholders in a partnership dedicated to preserving the natural resources and promoting a sustainable development. Its originality lies in the co- construction of a "conceptual model" of the functioning of the territory, according to a main negotiated development question. The approach is based on the collective articulation of the key elements of a territory and context by affected stakeholders such as managers, representatives, socio-professional technicians, NGOs, experts and scientists, and local policy makers. This sharing of representations is done by means of a series of collective workshops during which Actors, Resources, Dynamics and Interactions (ARDI), making up the stakes of the territory are identified and clarified. This work of co-construction is conducted within a precise methodological framework that we present in a step-by-step format. The method is also illustrated with concrete examples gleened from the tests carried out by the authors during the last 5 years. Finally, the need for skills development and pitfalls to avoid when applying the method are discussed.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f6c9e1d174b81a1efd1fd4fcf6a43ad4b7be075

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Art Dewulf
  2. Michel E. Etienne
  3. Tim Lynam
  4. Raphael Mathevet
  5. Coralie Calvet
  6. C. Pahl‐Wostl
  7. Geeske Scholz
  8. Helen Ross

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Michel E. Etienne
  2. Tim Lynam
  3. Raphael Mathevet
  4. Coralie Calvet
  5. C. Pahl‐Wostl
  6. Art Dewulf
  7. Geeske Scholz
  8. V. Adams

Citations in the corpus