Changing Perceptions of Change: The Role of Scientists in Tamarix and River Management

By J. Stromberg, M. Chew, Pamela L. Nagler, Edward P. Glenn. 2009

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f1560e1cb82807297d0d62be7a73dab613ffcac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
4. P. Hulme
5. Jan Pergl
6. M. Vilà
7. S. Kumschick
8. T. Blackburn

In Soil Science

1. M. Vilà
2. D. Richardson
3. Petr Pyšek

Citations in the corpus

• Sap flux-scaled transpiration by tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) before, during and after episodic defoliation by the saltcedar leaf beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) (2010, unknown): “(Shafroth et al., 2005; Owens and Moore, 2007; Nagler et al., 2009; Stromberg et al., 2009), although rates as low as 0.”
• Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health (2010, background): “Therefore, among the many challenges facing invasion biologists and restoration ecologists is the need to confront rapidly “changing perceptions of change” (163).”
• A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts (2014, background): “However, many alien species apparently have had little or no detectable effects on their new environment [1,10,11], and some effects may be considered to be positive [12–16].”
• Framework and guidelines for implementing the proposed IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) (2015, background): “Nevertheless, impacts vary greatly among alien taxa and among ecosystems, habitats or native species in the recipient geographic range; many notable impacts only become obvious or significantly influential long after the onset of invasion (Williamson & Fitter, 1996; Graves & Shapiro, 2003; Sogge et ”
• The Rise and Fall of Biotic Nativeness: A Historical Perspective (2010, background): “…from within and without examining invasion biology ’ s concepts and practices (for example Milton 2000 ; Subramaniam 2001 ; Sagoff 2002, 2005 ; Theodoropoulos 2003 ; Colautti & MacIsaac 2004 ; Brown & Sax 2005 ; Gobster 2005 ; Larson 2007 ; Warren 2007 ; Davis 2009 ; Stromberg et al. 2009 ).”
• The Potential Conservation Value of Non‐Native Species (2011, background): “Most scientists investigating the effects of non-native species try to conduct their work objectively; nevertheless, several authors have demonstrated that a bias persists against non-native species among scientists (Slobodkin 2001; Gurevitch & Padilla 2004; Stromberg et al. 2009).”
• Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2011, background): “Managers need research to be part of the solution to improve invasive plant control and scientists have been criticized for not closing this gap (Stromberg et al. 2009).”