Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

By K. Kettenring, C. Adams. 2011

639 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32de0f1240953a0d4cacf5a3cdbdfd378afc3043

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, methodology): “First, we searched for studies that cited and were cited in several major review papers on invasive species management (Zavaleta et al. 2001; Kettenring and Adams 2011; Pluess et al. 2012; Tobin et al. 2014; Jones et al. 2016).”
Priority effects and ecological restoration (2020, background): “Recent reviews January 2021 Restoration Ecology 5 of 11 have shown that there are more studies of controlling invasive species in restoration in North America compared to other countries (Kettenring & Adams 2011; Weidlich et al. 2020).”
Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance (2017, background): “Invasive plant control programs usually do not evaluate the role of native revegetation following removal (Kettenring and Adams 2011) and, to date, empirical tests have shown mixed results in terms of the effectiveness of plant restoration for controlling invasion.”
Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “Given that invasive species are notoriously difficult to remove (Gardener et al., 2010; Kettenring and Adams, 2011), it may be interesting to try to maintain ecological networks that”
Cover Crop for Early Season Weed Suppression in Crops: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are methods that have been widely used for quantitative research reviews (Miguez and Bollero, 2005; Kettenring and Adams, 2011; Basche et al., 2014; Egan et al., 2014; Shrestha et al., 2016).”
Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges (2017, background): “However, the ‘no action’ alternative (i.e. no invasive control) increases invader seed supply and potential spread to novel sites (Kettenring and Adams 2011).”
Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review (2020, background): “…sometimes the most important) restoration intervention (D'Antonio, August-Schmidt, & Fernandez-Going, 2016), as these plants may hinder the development of a native plant community in a degraded area (Brancalion, Campoe, et al., 2019; Kettenring & Adams, 2011; Prior, Adams, Klepzig, & Hulcr, 2018).”